Paper detail

The Two-Point Correlation Function of Gamma-ray Bursts

In this paper, we examine the spacial distribution of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) using a sample of 373 objects. We subdivide the GRB data into two redshift intervals over the redshift range $0<z< 6.7$. We measure the two-point correlation function (2PCF), $ξ(r)$ of the GRBs. In determining the separation distance of the GRB pairs, we consider two representative cosmological models: a cold dark matter universe plus a cosmological constant $Λ$, with $(Ω_{\rm m}, Ω_{\rm Λ})=(0.28,0.72)$ and an Einstein-de Sitter (EdS) universe, with $(Ω_{\rm m}, Ω_{\rm Λ})=(1,0)$. We find a $z$-decreasing correlation of the GRB distribution, which is in agreement with the predictions of the current structure formation theory. We fit a power-law model $ξ(r)=(r/r_0)^{-γ}$ to the measured $ξ(r)$ and obtain an amplitude and slope of $r_0= 1235.2 \pm 342.6~h^{-1}$ Mpc and $γ= 0.80\pm 0.19 $ ($1σ$ confidence level) over the scales $r=200$ to $10^4~h^{-1}$ Mpc. Our result provide a supplement to the measurement of matter correlation on large scales, while the matter distribution below $200~h^{-1}$ Mpc is usually described by the correlation function of galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.