Paper detail

The two-phase formation history of spiral galaxies traced by the cosmic evolution of the bar fraction

We study the evolution of galactic bars and the link with disk and spheroid formation in a sample of zoom-in cosmological simulations. Our simulation sample focuses on galaxies with present-day stellar masses in the 10^10-10^11 Msun range, in field and loose group environments, with a broad variety of mass growth histories. In our models, bars are almost absent from the progenitors of present-day spirals at z>1.5, and they remain rare and generally too weak to be observable down to z~1. After this characteristic epoch, the fractions of observable and strong bars raise rapidly, bars being present in 80% of spiral galaxies and easily observable in two thirds of these at z<0.5. This is quantitatively consistent with the redshift evolution of the observed bar fraction. Our models predict that the decrease in the bar fraction with increasing redshift should continue with a fraction of observable bars <10-15% in disk galaxies at z>1. Our models also predict later bar formation in lower-mass galaxies, in agreement with existing data. We find that the characteristic epoch of bar formation, namely redshift z~0.8-1, corresponds to the epoch at which today's spirals acquire their disk-dominated morphology. At higher redshift, disks tend to be rapidly destroyed by mergers and gravitational instabilities and rarely develop significant bars. The bar formation epoch corresponds to the transition between an early "violent" phase of spiral galaxy formation at z>1 and a late "secular" phase at z<0.8. In the secular phase, the presence of bars substantially contributes to the growth of the bulge, but the bulge mass budget remains statistically dominated by the contribution of mergers, interactions and disk instabilities at high redshift. Early bars at z>1 are often short-lived, while most of the bars formed at z<1 persist down to z=0, late cosmological gas infall being necessary to maintain some of them.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.