Paper detail

The Two-Peak Model of LS I +61303: Radio Spectral Index Analysis

The most puzzling aspect of the radio emission from LSI+61303 is that the large periodic radio outburst, with period equal to the orbital one, occurs very displaced from periastron passage, nearly at apoastron. In 1992, Taylor, one of the discoverers of this source, together with his collaborators proposed a model of a compact object in an eccentric orbit accreting from the equatorial wind of the Be star primary. The application of this model by Marti & Paredes (1995) predicts one ejection at periastron and a second more displaced ejection along the orbit. The first ejection should correspond to weak radio emission, because of strong inverse Compton losses of the emitting electrons due to the proximity to the hot Be star, whereas the second ejection, quite displaced from the star, would correspond to a strong radio outburst, that one indeed observed. Corroborated along the years by numerical computations, simulations and gamma-ray observations, until now this two-peak model could not be proved in the radio band, because of the negligible emission around periastron. We show here, that the radio spectral index based on the ratio of flux densities is the unique tool to monitor activity of LSI+61303 in the radio band around periastron. The analysis of the radio spectral index over almost 7 years of Green Bank Interferometer data results in a clear double-peaked spectral index curve along the orbit. This result gives finally observational support at radiowavelengths to the two-peak accretion/ejection model for LSI+61303. Moreover, the here shown comparison of the two-peak curves - the radio spectral index curve and the Fermi-LAT gamma-ray curve - indicates a new interesting hypothesis on the electron population responsible for the gamma-ray emission.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.