Paper detail

The twilight of the single field slow rolling inflaton

We present an study from PLANCK2013+WP+BAO:$Λ$CDM+$r$+$α_s$ data, where 49 slow roll inflationary potentials are tested, showing that the theoretical value of the running provided by 48 of these potentials has a deviation to the expected observational value larger than $1.6σ$, and its modulus is smaller than the modulus of the expected observational one, what disfavours these models at 94.5 \% of Confidence Level (C.L.), concluding from these results that, inflationary cosmology may require multiple fields or a breakdown of slow roll condition. This conclusion has drastically changed with the last data provided by PLANCK2015 where the modulus of the expected observational value of the running has been reduced one order, getting shorter the distance to its theoretical value $1σ$ or more, what allows the viability of the majority of the potentials disfavored by the running provided by PLANCK2013 data. However if one takes into account the running of the running, its theoretical value, which in the slow roll regime depends on the slow roll parameters at third order, is incompatible with the expected observational value provided by PLANCK2013 and PLANCK2015, disfavouring at 92.8 \% C.L. or more, 39 of the 49 slow roll potentials tested. Moreover, if one restricts the number of e-folds to be between 30 and 80, then only two potentials will survive to this test.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.