Paper detail

The Tukey Order and Subsets of $ω_1$

One partially ordered set, $Q$, is a Tukey quotient of another, $P$, if there is a map $ϕ: P \to Q$ carrying cofinal sets of $P$ to cofinal sets of $Q$. Two partial orders which are mutual Tukey quotients are said to be Tukey equivalent. Let $X$ be a space and denote by $\mathcal{K}(X)$ the set of compact subsets of $X$, ordered by inclusion. The principal object of this paper is to analyze the Tukey equivalence classes of $\mathcal{K}(S)$ corresponding to various subspaces $S$ of $ω_1$, their Tukey invariants, and hence the Tukey relations between them. It is shown that $ω^ω$ is a strict Tukey quotient of $Σ(ω^{ω_1})$ and thus we distinguish between two Tukey classes out of Isbell's ten partially ordered sets. The relationships between Tukey equivalence classes of $\mathcal{K}(S)$, where $S$ is a subspace of $ω_1$, and $\mathcal{K}(M)$, where $M$ is a separable metrizable space, are revealed. Applications are given to function spaces.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.