Paper detail

The Tucana dwarf spheroidal galaxy: not such a massive failure after all

Isolated Local Group (LG) dwarf galaxies have evolved most or all of their life unaffected by interactions with the large LG spirals and therefore offer the opportunity to learn about the intrinsic characteristics of this class of objects. Here we explore the internal kinematic and metallicity properties of one of the three isolated LG dwarf spheroidal galaxies, i.e. the Tucana dSph. This is an intriguing system, as it has been found in the literature to have an internal rotation of up to 16 km/s, a much higher velocity dispersion than other dSphs of similar luminosity, and a possible exception to the too-big-too-fail problem. We present results for a new VLT/FORS2 spectroscopic dataset in the CaII triplet region for 50 candidate red giant branch stars in the direction of Tucana, which yielded line-of-sight velocity and metallicity ([Fe/H]) measurements of 39 effective members. This doubles the number of Tucana's stars with such measurements. In addition, we re-reduce and include in our analysis the other two spectroscopic datasets presented in the literature, the VLT/FORS2 sample by Fraternali et al. (2009) and the VLT/FLAMES one by Gregory et al. (2019). We measure a systemic velocity of $180.0\pm1.3$ km/s, consistently across the various datasets analyzed, and find that a dispersion-only model is moderately favored over models accounting also for internal rotation. Our best estimate of the internal velocity dispersion is $6.2_{-1.3}^{+1.6}$ km/s, much smaller than the values reported in the literature and in line with similarly luminous dSphs; this is consistent with Tucana not being an exception to the too-big-to-fail problem, nor living in a dark matter halo much more massive than those of its siblings. As for the metallicity properties, we do not find anything unusual; there are hints of the presence of a [Fe/H] gradient but more data are needed to pin its presence down.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.