Paper detail

The transition to nonlinearity and new constraints on biasing

We present two new dynamical tests of the biasing hypothesis. The first is based on the amplitude and the shape of the galaxy-galaxy correlation function, $ξ_g(r)$, where $r$ is the separation of the galaxy pair. The second test uses the mean relative peculiar velocity for galaxy pairs, $\vs(r)$. This quantity is a measure of the rate of growth of clustering and it is related to the two-point correlation function for the matter density fluctuations, $ξ(r)$. Under the assumption that galaxies trace the mass ($ξ_g = ξ$), the expected relative velocity can be calculated directly from the observed galaxy clustering. The above assumption can be tested by confronting the expected $\vs$ with direct measurements from velocity-distance surveys. Both our methods are checked against N-body experiments and then compared with the $ξ_g(r)$ and $\vs$ estimated from the {\sc APM} galaxy survey and the Mark III catalogue, respectively. Our results suggest that cosmological density parameter is low, $Ω_m \approx 0.3$, and that the {\sc APM} galaxies trace the mass at separations $r \ga 5 \Mlu$, where $h$ is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s$^{-1}$Mpc. The present results agree with earlier studies, based on comparing higher order correlations in the {\sc APM} with weakly non-linear perturbation theory. Both approaches constrain the linear bias factor to be within 20% of unity. If the existence of the feature we identified in the {\sc APM} $ξ_g(r)$ -- the inflection point near $ξ_g = 1$ -- is confirmed by more accurate surveys, we may have discovered gravity's smoking gun: the long awaited ``shoulder'' in $ξ$, generated by gravitational dynamics and predicted by Gott and Rees 25 years ago.

preprint2001arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.