Paper detail

The torque transfer coefficient in DNA under torsional stress

In recent years, significant progress in understanding the properties of supercoiled DNA has been obtained due to nanotechniques that made stretching and twisting of single molecules possible. Quantitative interpretation of such experiments requires accurate knowledge of torques inside manipulated DNA. This paper argues that it is not possible to transfer the entire magnitudes of external torques to the twisting stress of the double helix, and that a reducing torque transfer coefficient (TTC<1) should always be assumed. This assertion agrees with simple physical intuition and is supported by the results of all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. According to MD, the TTCs around 0.8 are observed in nearly optimal conditions. Reaching higher values requires special efforts and it should be difficult in practice. The TTC can be partially responsible for the persistent discrepancies between the twisting rigidity of DNA measured by different methods.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.