Paper detail

The Torelli problem for Logarithmic bundles of hypersurface arrangements in the projective space

Let $ \mathcal{D} = \{D_{1}, \ldots, D_{\ell}\} $ be an arrangement of smooth hypersurfaces with normal crossings on the complex projective space $ \mathbb{P}^{n} $ and let $ Ω^{1}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}}(log \mathcal{D}) $ be the logarithmic bundle attached to it. Our aim is to study the injectivity of the correspondence $ \mathcal{D} \longrightarrow Ω^{1}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}}(log \mathcal{D}) $. In order to do that, we first show that $ Ω^{1}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}}(log \mathcal{D}) $ admits a resolution of length $ 1 $ depending on the degrees and on the equations of $ D_{1}, \ldots, D_{\ell} $. Then, we prove a Torelli type theorem when $ \mathcal{D} $ has a sufficiently large number of components of the same degree $ d $, by recovering them as unstable smooth irreducible degree-$d$ hypersurfaces of $ Ω^{1}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}}(log \mathcal{D}) $. The cases of one quadric and a pair of quadrics in $ \mathbb{P}^{n} $ are not Torelli; in particular, through a duality argument, we prove that the isomorphism class of the logarithmic bundle attached to a pair of quadrics is determined by the tangent hyperplanes to the pair. Finally, by describing the moduli spaces containing $ Ω^{1}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(log \mathcal{D}) $, we show that some line-conic arrangements are not of Torelli type.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.