Paper detail

The topology of projective codes and the distribution of zeros of odd maps

We show that the size of codes in projective space controls structural results for zeros of odd maps from spheres to Euclidean space. In fact, this relation is given through the topology of the space of probability measures on the sphere whose supports have diameter bounded by some specific parameter. Our main result is a generalization of the Borsuk--Ulam theorem, and we derive four consequences of it: (i) We give a new proof of a result of Simonyi and Tardos on topological lower bounds for the circular chromatic number of a graph; (ii) we study generic embeddings of spheres into Euclidean space and show that projective codes give quantitative bounds for a measure of genericity of sphere embeddings; and we prove generalizations of (iii) the Ham Sandwich theorem and (iv) the Lyusternik--Shnirel'man--Borsuk covering theorem for the case where the number of measures or sets in a covering, respectively, may exceed the ambient dimension.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.