Paper detail

The TopFlavor scheme in the context of $W'$ searches at LHC

Many extensions of the Standard Model predict the existence of new charged or neutral gauge bosons, with a wide variety of phenomenological implications depending on the model adopted. The search for such particles is extensively carried through at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and it is therefore of crucial importance to have for each proposed scenario quantitative predictions that can be matched to experiments. In this work we focus on the implications of one of these models, the TopFlavor Model, proposing a charged $\text{W}^\prime$ boson that has preferential couplings to the third generation fermions. We compare such predictions to the ones from the so called Sequential Standard Model (SSM), that is used as benchmark, being one of the simplest and most commonly considered models for searches at the LHC. We identify the parameter space still open for searches at the LHC, and in particular we show that the cross section for the processes $pp \to \text{W}^\prime \to τν$ and $pp \to \text{W}^\prime \to tb$ can be up to two orders of magnitude smaller with respect to the SSM, depending on the free parameters of the model, like the particle mass and its width. This study makes the case for further searches at the LHC, and shows how a complete and systematic model independent analysis of $\text{W}^\prime$ boson phenomenology at colliders is essential to provide guidance for future searches.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.