Paper detail

The Top Quark Mass in Supersymmetric SO(10) Unification

The successful prediction of $\sin^2θ_W$ suggests that the effective theory beneath the GUT scale is the two-Higgs MSSM. If we further assume that the unified gauge group contains SO(10), that the two light Higgs doublets lie mostly in a single irreducible SO(10) representation, and that the $t$, $b$ and $τ$ masses originate in renormalizable Yukawa interactions of the form $16_3 O 16_3$, then also the top quark mass can be predicted in terms of the MSSM parameters. To compute $m_t$ we present a precise analytic approximation to the solution of the 2-loop renormalization group equations, and study supersymmetric and GUT threshold corrections and the input value of the $b$ quark mass. The large ratio of top to bottom quark masses derives from a large ratio, $\tanβ$, of Higgs vacuum expectation values. We point out that when $\tanβ$ is large, so are certain corrections to the $b$ quark mass prediction, unless a particular hierarchy exists in the parameters of the model. With such a hierarchy, which may result from approximate symmetries, the top mass prediction depends only weakly on the spectrum. Our results may be applied to any supersymmetric SO(10)-like model as long as $λ_t\simeq λ_b\simeqλ_τ$ at the GUT scale and there are no intermediate mass scales in the desert.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.