Paper detail

The Top-K Tau-Path Screen for Monotone Association

A pair of variables that tend to rise and fall either together or in opposition are said to be monotonically associated. For certain phenomena, this tendency is causally restricted to a subpopulation, as, for example, an allergic reaction to an irritant. Previously, Yu et al. (2011) devised a method of rearranging observations to test paired data to see if such an association might be present in a subpopulation. However, the computational intensity of the method limited its application to relatively small samples of data, and the test itself only judges if association is present in some subpopulation; it does not clearly identify the subsample that came from this subpopulation, especially when the whole sample tests positive. The present paper adds a "top-K" feature (Sampath and Verducci (2013)) based on a multistage ranking model, that identifies a concise subsample that is likely to contain a high proportion of observations from the subpopulation in which the association is supported. Computational improvements incorporated into this top-K tau-path (TKTP) algorithm now allow the method to be extended to thousands of pairs of variables measured on sample sizes in the thousands. A description of the new algorithm along with measures of computational complexity and practical efficiency help to gauge its potential use in different settings. Simulation studies catalog its accuracy in various settings, and an example from finance illustrates its step-by-step use.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.