Paper detail

The $μ\to eγ$ decay in an EW-scale non-sterile RH neutrino model

We study in this research the phenomenology of $μ\to eγ$ decay in a scenario of the class of extended models with non-sterile right-handed (RH) neutrino at electroweak (EW) scale proposed by P.Q. Hung. Field content of the standard model (SM) is enlarged by introducing for each SM fermion a corresponding mirror partner with the same quantum numbers beside opposite chirality. Light neutrino masses are generated via the type-I see-saw mechanism and it is also proved to be relevant with low energy within the EW scale of the RH neutrino masses. We introduce the model and derive branching ratio of the $μ\to eγ$ decay at one-loop approximation with the participation of W gauge boson, neutral and singly charged Higgs scalars. After that we set constraints on relevant parameters and predict the sensitivities of the decay channel under the present and future experiments.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.