Paper detail

The timing of life history events in presence of soft disturbances

We study a model for the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) used by biological populations for choosing the time of life-history events, such as migration and breeding. In our model we accounted for both intra-species competition (early individuals have a competitive advantage) and a disturbance which strikes at a random time, killing a fraction $1-p$ of the population. Disturbances include spells of bad weather, such as freezing or heavily raining days. It has been shown in Iwasa and Levin (1995), that when $p=0$, then the ESS is a mixed strategy, where individuals wait for a certain time and afterwards start arriving (or breeding) every day. We remove the constraint $p=0$ and show that if $0<p<1$ then the ESS still implies a mixed choice of times, but strong competition may lead to a massive arrival at the earliest time possible of a fraction of the population, while the rest will arrive throughout the whole period during which the disturbance may occur. More precisely, given $p$, there is a threshold for the competition parameter $a$, above which massive arrivals occur and below which there is a behaviour as in Iwasa and Levin (1995). We study the behaviour of the ESS and of the average fitness of the population, depending on the parameters involved. We also discuss how the population may be affected by climate change, in two respects: first, how the ESS should change under the new climate and whether this change implies an increase of the average fitness; second, which is the impact of the new climate on a population that still follows the old strategy. We show that, at least under some conditions, extreme weather events imply a temporary decrease of the average fitness (thus an increasing mortality). If the population adapts to the new climate, the survivors may have a larger fitness.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.