Abstract

Recent JWST observations hint at unexpectedly intense cosmic star-formation in the early Universe, often attributed to enhanced star-formation efficiencies (SFEs). Here, we analyze the SFE in THESAN-ZOOM, a novel zoom-in radiation-hydrodynamic simulation campaign of high-redshift (z≳3z \gtrsim 3) galaxies employing a state-of-the-art galaxy formation model resolving the multiphase interstellar medium (ISM). The halo-scale SFE (εhalo∗ε^{\ast}_{\rm halo}) - the fraction of baryons accreted by a halo that are converted to stars - follows a double power-law dependence on halo mass, with a mild redshift evolution above Mhalo≳109.5 M⊙M_{\rm halo} \gtrsim 10^{9.5}\,{\rm M}_{\odot}. The power-law slope is roughly 1/31/3 at large halo masses, consistent with expectations when gas outflows are momentum-driven. At lower masses, the slope is roughly 2/32/3 and is more aligned with the energy-driven outflow scenario. εhalo∗ε^{\ast}_{\rm halo} is a factor of 2−32-3 larger than commonly assumed in empirical galaxy-formation models at Mhalo≲1011 M⊙M_{\rm halo} \lesssim 10^{11}\,{\rm M}_{\odot}. On galactic (kpc) scales, the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) relation of neutral gas is universal in THESAN-ZOOM, following ΣSFR∝Σgas2Σ_{\rm SFR} \propto Σ_{\rm gas}^2, indicative of a turbulent energy balance in the ISM maintained by stellar feedback. The rise of εhalo∗ε^{\ast}_{\rm halo} with halo mass can be traced primarily to increasing gas surface densities in massive galaxies, while the underlying KS relation and neutral, star-forming gas fraction remain unchanged. Although the increase in εhalo∗ε^{\ast}_{\rm halo} with redshift is relatively modest, it is sufficient to explain the large observed number density of UV-bright galaxies at z≳12z \gtrsim 12. However, reproducing the brightest sources at MUV≲−21M_{\rm UV} \lesssim -21 may require extrapolating the SFE beyond the halo mass range directly covered by THESAN-ZOOM.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.