Paper detail

The theory of figures of Clairaut with focus on the gravitational rigidity modulus: inequalities and an improvement in the Darwin-Radau equation

This paper contains a review of Clairaut's theory with focus on the determination of a gravitational rigidity modulus $γ$ defined as $\left(\frac{C-I_o}{I_o}\right)γ=\frac{2}{3}Ω^2$, where $C$ and $I_o$ are the polar and mean moment of inertia of the body and $Ω$ is the body spin.The constant $γ$ is related to the static fluid Love number $k_2= \frac{3I_o G}{R^5} \frac{1}γ$, where $R$ is the body radius and $G$ is the gravitational constant. The new results are: a variational principle for $γ$, upper and lower bounds on the ellipticity that improve previous bounds by Chandrasekhar (1963) and a semi-empirical procedure for estimating $γ$ from the knowledge of $m$, $I_o$, and $R$, where $m$ is the mass of the body. The main conclusion is that for $0.2\le I_o/(mR^2)\le 0.4$ the approximation $γ\approx G \sqrt{ \frac{2^7}{5^5}\frac{m^5}{I_o^3}}= γ_I$ is a better estimate for $γ$ than that obtained from the Darwin-Radau equation, denoted as $γ_{DR}$. Moreover, within the range of applicability of the Darwin-Radau equation $0.32\le I_o/(mR^2)\le 0.4$ the relative difference between the two estimates, $|γ_{DR}/γ_I -1|$, is less than $0.05\%$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.