Paper detail

The Theoretical Mass--Magnitude Relation of Low-Mass Stars and its Metallicity Dependence

We investigate the dependence of theoretically generated mass - (absolute magnitude) relations on stellar models. Using up to date physics we compute models in the mass range 0.1 < m < 1M_sun. We compare the solar-metallicity models with our older models, with recent models computed by others, and also with an empirical mass - (absolute magnitude) relation that best fits the observed data. At a given mass below 0.6M_sun the effective temperatures differ substantially from model to model. However taken individually each set of models is in good agreement with observations in the mass - luminosity plane. A minimum in the derivative dm/dM_V at M_V = 11.5, which is due to H_2 formation and establishment of a fully convective stellar interior, is present in all photometric bands, for all models. This minimum leads to a maximum in the stellar luminosity function for Galactic disk stars at M_V = 11.5, M_bol = 9.8. Stellar models should locate this maximum in the stellar luminosity function at the same magnitude as observations. Models which incorporate the most realistic theoretical atmospheres and the most recent equation of state and opacities can satisfy this constraint. These models are also in best agreement with the most recent luminosity - (effective temperature) and mass-luminosity data. Each set of our models of a given metallicity (with 0.2 > [Fe/H] > -2.3) shows a maximum in -dm/dM_bol, which moves to brighter bolometric magnitudes with decreasing metallicity. The change in location of the maximum, as a function of [Fe/H], follows the location of structure in luminosity functions for stellar populations with different metal abundances. This structure seen in all observed stellar populations can be accounted for by the mass--luminosity relation.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.