Paper detail

The tensile strength of dust aggregates consisting of small elastic grains: Constraints on the size of condensates in protoplanetary disks

A consensus view on the formation of planetesimals is now exposed to a threat, since recent numerical studies on the mechanical properties of dust aggregates tend to dispute the conceptual picture that submicrometer-sized grains conglomerate into planetesimals in protoplanetary disks. With the advent of precise laboratory experiments and extensive computer simulations on the interaction between elastic spheres comprising dust aggregates, we revisit a model for the tensile strength of dust aggregates consisting of small elastic grains. In the framework of contact mechanics and fracture mechanics, we examine outcomes of computer simulations and laboratory experiments on the tensile strength of dust aggregates. We provide a novel analytical formula that explicitly incorporates the volume effect on the tensile strength, namely, the dependence of tensile strength on the volume of dust aggregates. We find that our model for the tensile strength of dust aggregates well reproduces results of computer simulations and laboratory experiments, if appropriate values are adopted for the elastic parameters used in the model. Moreover, the model with dust aggregates of submicrometer-sized grains is in good harmony with the tensile strength of cometary dust and meteoroids derived from astronomical observations. Therefore, we reaffirm the commonly believed idea that the formation of planetesimals begins with conglomeration of submicrometer-sized grains condensed in protoplanetary disks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.