Paper detail

The temperature of IGM at high redshifts: shock heating and high mach problem

The thermal history of cosmic gas in the Dark Ages remains largely unknown. It is important to quantify the impact of relevant physics on the IGM temperature between $z=10$ and $z \sim 30$, in order to interpret recent and oncoming observations, including results reported by EDGES. We revisit the gas heating due to structure formation shocks in this era, using a set of fixed grid cosmological hydrodynamical simulations performed by three different codes. In all our simulations, the cosmic gas is predicted to be in multiphase state since $z>30$. The gas surrounding high density peaks gradually develops a relation more sharp than $T \propto ρ^{2/3}$, approximately $T \propto ρ^{2}$, from $z=30$ to $z=11$, might due to shock heating. Meanwhile, the gas in void region tends to have a large local mach number, and their thermal state varies significantly from code to code. In the redshift range $11-20$, the mass fraction of gas shock heated above the CMB temperature in our simulations is larger than previous semi-analytical results by a factor of 2 to 8. At $z=15$, the fraction varies from $\sim 19\%$ to $52 \%$ among different codes. Between $z=11$ and $z=20$, the gas temperature $<1/T_{\rm{K}}>_M^{-1}$ is predicted to be $\sim 10-20$ K by two codes, much higher than the adiabatic cooling model and some previous works. However, in our simulations performed by RAMSES, $<1/T_{\rm{K}}>_M^{-1}$ is predicted to be even below the temperature required to explain result of the EDGES. Given the fact that different codes give different predictions, currently, it seems a challenge to make solid prediction on the temperature of gas at $z \sim 17$ in simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.