Paper detail

The tearing mode instability of thin current sheets: the transition to fast reconnection in the presence of viscosity

This paper studies the growth rate of reconnection instabilities in thin current sheets in the presence of both resistivity and viscosity. In a previous paper, Pucci and Velli (2014), it was argued that at sufficiently high Lundquist number S it is impossible to form current sheets with aspect ratios L/a which scale as $L/a\sim S^α$ with $α> 1/3$ because the growth rate of the tearing mode would then diverge in the ideal limit $S\rightarrow\infty$. Here we extend their analysis to include the effects of viscosity, (always present in numerical simulations along with resistivity) and which may play a role in the solar corona and other astrophysical environments. A finite Prandtl number allows current sheets to reach larger aspect ratios before becoming rapidly unstable in pile-up type regimes. Scalings with Lundquist and Prandtl numbers are discussed as well as the transition to kinetic reconnection

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.