Paper detail

The Te[N II]-Te[O III] temperature relation in H II regions and the reliability of strong-line methods

We use a sample of 154 observations of 124 H II regions that have measurements of both Te[O III] and Te[N II], compiled from the literature, to explore the behaviour of the Te[O III]-Te[N II] temperature relation. We confirm that the relation depends on the degree of ionization and present a new set of relations for two different ranges of this parameter. We study the effects introduced by our temperature relations and four other available relations in the calculation of oxygen and nitrogen abundances. We find that our relations improve slightly on the results obtained with the previous ones. We also use a sample of 26 deep, high-resolution spectra to estimate the contribution of blending to the intensity of the temperature-sensitive line [O III] $\lambda4363$, and we derive a relation to correct Te[O III] for this effect. With our sample of 154 spectra, we analyse the reliability of the R, S, O3N2, N2, ONS, and C strong-line methods by comparing the metallicity obtained with these methods with the one implied by the direct method. We find that the strong-line methods introduce differences that reach ~ 0.2 dex or more, and that these differences depend on O/H, N/O, and the degree of ionization.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.