Paper detail

The swept rule for breaking the latency barrier in time advancing two-dimensional PDEs

This article describes a method to accelerate parallel, explicit time integration of two-dimensional unsteady PDEs. The method is motivated by our observation that latency, not bandwidth, often limits how fast PDEs can be solved in parallel. The method is called the swept rule of space-time domain decomposition. Compared to conventional, space-only domain decomposition, it communicates similar amount of data, but in fewer messages. The swept rule achieves this by decomposing space and time among computing nodes in ways that exploit the domains of influence and the domain of dependency, making it possible to communicate once per many time steps with no redundant computation. By communicating less often, the swept rule effectively breaks the latency barrier, advancing on average more than one time step per ping-pong latency of the network. The article presents simple theoretical analysis to the performance of the swept rule in two spatial dimensions, and supports the analysis with numerical experiments.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.