Paper detail

The survival of dynamical fossils in dwarf spheroidal galaxies in conventional and modified dynamics

The survival of unbound density substructure against orbital mixing imposes strong constraints on the slope of the underlying gravitational potential and provides a new test on modified gravities. Here we investigate whether the interpretation that the stellar clump in Ursa Minor (UMi) dwarf spheroidal galaxy is a `dynamical fossil' is consistent with Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). For UMi mass models inferred by fitting the velocity dispersion profile, the stellar clump around the second peak of UMi is erased very rapidly, within 1.25 Gyr (6.5 orbits), even with the inclusion of self-gravity. We find that the clump can hardly survive for more than 2 Gyr even under more generous conditions. Alternative scenarios which could lead to a kinematically cold clump are discussed but, so far, none of them were found to be fully satisfactory. Our conclusion is that the cold clump in UMi poses a challenge for both LambdaCDM and MOND.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.