Paper detail

The Supermassive Black Hole Mass - Spheroid Stellar Mass Relation for Sérsic and Core-Sérsic Galaxies

We have examined the relationship between supermassive black hole mass (M$_{BH}$) and the stellar mass of the host spheroid (M$_{sph,*}$) for a sample of 75 nearby galaxies. To derive the spheroid stellar masses we used improved 2MASS K$_s$-band photometry from the ARCHANGEL photometry pipeline. Dividing our sample into core-Sérsic and Sérsic galaxies, we find that they are described by very different M$_{BH}$-M$_{sph,*}$ relations. For core-Sérsic galaxies - which are typically massive and luminous, with M$_{BH} \gtrsim 2x10^8 M_\odot$ - we find M$_{BH} \propto M_{sph,*}^{(0.97 \pm 0.14)}$, consistent with other literature relations. However, for the Sérsic galaxies - with typically lower masses, M$_{sph,*} \lesssim 3x10^10 M_\odot$ - we find M$_BH \propto M_{sph,*}^{(2.22 \pm 0.58)}$, a dramatically steeper slope that differs by more than 2 standard deviations. This relation confirms that, for Sérsic galaxies, M$_{BH}$ is not a constant fraction of M$_{sph,*}$. Sérsic galaxies can grow via the accretion of gas which fuels both star formation and the central black hole, as well as through merging. Their black hole grows significantly more rapidly than their host spheroid, prior to growth by dry merging events that produce core-Sérsic galaxies, where the black hole and spheroid grow in lock step. We have additionally compared our Sérsic M$_{BH}$-M$_{sph,*}$ relation with the corresponding relation for nuclear star clusters, confirming that the two classes of central massive object follow significantly different scaling relations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.