Paper detail

The Supermassive Black Hole and Dark Matter Halo of NGC 4649 (M60)

We apply the axisymmetric orbit superposition modeling to estimate the mass of the supermassive black hole and dark matter halo profile of NGC 4649. We have included data sets from the Hubble Space Telescope, stellar, and globular cluster observations. Our modeling gives the black hole mass = 4.5 \pm 1.0 10^9 \Msun and M/L = 8.7 \pm 1.0 (or 8.0 \pm 0.9 after foreground Galactic extinction is corrected). We confirm the presence of a dark matter halo, but the stellar mass dominates inside the effective radius. The parameters of the dark halo are less constrained due to the sparse globular cluster data at large radii. We find that in NGC 4649 the dynamical mass profile from our modeling is consistently larger than that derived from the X-ray data over most of the radial range by roughly 60% to 80%. It implies that either some forms of non-thermal pressure need to be included, the assumed hydrostatic equilibrium may not be a good approximation in the X-ray modelings of NGC 4649, or our assumptions used in the dynamical models are biased. Our new black hole mass is about two times larger than the previous published value; the earlier model did not adequately sample the orbits required to match the large tangential anisotropy in the galaxy center. If we assume that there is no dark matter, the results on the black hole mass and M/L do not change significantly, which we attribute to the inclusion of HST spectra, the sparse globular cluster kinematics, and a diffuse dark matter halo. Without the HST data, the significance of the black hole detection is greatly reduced.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.