Paper detail

The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey. Paper II: Image detection, parameterisation, classification and photometry

In this, the second in a series of three papers concerning the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey, we describe the methods for image detection, parameterisation, classification and photometry. We demonstrate the internal and external accuracy of our object parameters. Using examples from the first release of data, the South Galactic Cap survey, we show that our image detection completeness is close to 100% to within 1.5 mag of the nominal plate limits. We show that for the Bj survey data, the image classification is externally > 99% reliable to Bj = 19.5. Internally, the image classification is reliable at a level of > 90% to Bj=21, R=19. The photometric accuracy of our data is typically 0.3 mag with respect to external data for m > 15. Internally, the relative photometric accuracy in restricted position and magnitude ranges can be as accurate as 5% for well exposed stellar images. Colours (B-R or R-I) are externally accurate to 0.07 mag at Bj = 16.5 rising to 0.16 mag at Bj = 20.

preprint2001arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.