Paper detail

The superconducting state in the B2H6 compound at 360 GPa

In the paper, the thermodynamic properties of the superconducting state in the $\rm{B_{2}H_{6}}$ compound have been characterized. The pressure of 360 GPa has been taken into account. The calculations have been carried out in the framework of the Eliashberg formalism for the wide range of the Coulomb pseudopotential: $μ^{\star}\in<0.1,0.3>$. It has been found that the critical temperature ($T_{C}$) varies in the range from 147 K to 87 K, depending on the assumed value of the Coulomb pseudopotential. The ratio of the energy gap to the critical temperature ($R_Δ\equiv 2Δ(0)/k_{B}T_{C}$) significantly exceeds the value predicted by the BCS theory: $R_Δ\in<4.24,3.98>$. In the similar manner behaves the ratio of the specific heat jump to the heat of the normal state ($R_{C}\equivΔC(T_{C})/C^{N}(T_{C})$), namely: $R_{C}\in<2.33,2.17>$. The parameter $R_{H}\equiv T_{C}C^{N}(T_{C})/H^{2}_{C}(0)$, where $H_{C}(0)$ is the thermodynamic critical field, ranges from 0.144 to 0.168.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.