Paper detail

The SuperCDMS Experiment

WIMP-nucleon cross sections in the range 10^{-46} - 10^{-44} cm^2 may be probed by a ton-scale experiment with low energy thresholds and excellent discrimination of backgrounds. Because CDMS ZIP detectors are the most proven means of achieving such good discrimination, we intend to scale CDMS up to a ton detector mass. Development of this experiment, dubbed "SuperCDMS," is discussed. Improved analysis and optimization of the charge collection and athermal phonon sensors should improve surface-background rejection by over two orders of magnitude. Siting the SuperCDMS experiment deep enough to remove the fast neutron background, and reducing radioactive beta contamination near or on the detectors, should sufficiently reduce these otherwise troubling backgrounds. The primary challenge is making the experiment easy enough to build. We discuss methods of improving the detector manufacturability, removing the need for large-scale cryogenic detector testing, and allowing simplified infrastructure by using more sophisticated readout.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.