Paper detail

The sub- and quasi- centurial cycles in solar and geomagnetical data series /(s2)

The subject of this paper is the existence and stability of solar cycles with duration in the range of 20-250 years. Five type of data series are used: 1) The Zurich series (1749-2009), the mean annual International sunspot number Ri; 2) The Group sunspot number series Rh (1610-1995); 3) The simulated extended sunspot Rsi number from Extended time series of Solar Activity Indices (ESAI) (1090- 2002); 4) The simulated extended geomagnetic aa-index from ESAI (1099-2002); 5) The Meudon filament series (1919-1991) (it is used only particularly). Data series are smoothed over 11 years and supercenturial trends are removed. Two principally independent methods of time series analysis are used: the T-R periodogram analysis (both in the standard and "scanning window" regimes) and the wavelet-analysis. The obtained results are very similar. It is found that in all series a strong cycle with mean duration of 55-60 years exists. It is very well expressed in the 18th and the 19th centuries. It is less pronounced during the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries. On the other hand a strong and stable quasi 110-120 years and ~200-year cycles are obtained in most of these series. However the 200-yr cycle is not detectable in the Zurich series. There is a strong mean oscillation of ~ 95 years, which is absent in the other data sets. The analysis of the ESAI (AD 1090-2002) proved that the quasi century cycle has a relatively stable doublet (~80 and ~120 years) or triplet (~55-60, 80 and 120 years) structure during the last ~900 years. Most probably the different type of oscillations in the sub-century and century period range corresponds to cycles of different classes of active regions. The solar-terrestrial relationships aspects of these results are briefly discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.