Paper detail

The structure theory of Nilspaces III: Inverse limit representations and topological dynamics

This paper forms the third part of a series by the authors [GMV1,GMV2] concerning the structure theory of nilspaces. A nilspace is a compact space $X$ together with closed collections of cubes $C^n(X)\subseteq X^{2^n}$, $n=1,2,\ldots$, satisfying some natural axioms. Our goal is to extend the structure theory of nilspaces obtained by Antolín Camarena and Szegedy, and to provide new proofs. Our main result is that, under the technical assumption that $C^n(X)$ is a connected space for all $n$, then $X$ is isomorphic (in a strong sense) to an inverse limit of nilmanifolds. This is a direct and slight generalization of the main result of Antolín Camarena and Szegedy. We also apply our methods to obtain structure theorems in the setting of topological dynamics. Specifically, if $H$ is a group (subject to very mild topological assumptions) and $(H,X)$ is a minimal dynamical system, then we give a simple characterization of the maximal pronilfactor of $X$. This generalizes the case $H = \mathbb{Z}$, which is a theorem of Host, Kra and Maass, although even in that case we give a significantly different proof.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.