Paper detail

The structure of the magnetic reconnection exhaust boundary

The structure of shocks that form at the exhaust boundaries during collisionless reconnection of anti-parallel fields is studied using particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations and modeling based on the anisotropic magnetohydrodynamic equations. Large-scale PIC simulations of reconnection and companion Riemann simulations of shock development demonstrate that the pressure anisotropy produced by counterstreaming ions within the exhaust prevents the development of classical Petschek switch-off-slow shocks (SSS). The shock structure that does develop is controlled by the firehose stability parameter epsilon=1-mu_0(P_parallel-P_perpendicular)/ B^2 through its influence on the speed order of the intermediate and slow waves. Here P_parallel and P_perpendicular are the pressure parallel and perpendicular to the local magnetic field. The exhaust boundary is made up of a series of two shocks and a rotational wave. The first shock takes epsilon from unity upstream to a plateau of 0.25 downstream. The condition epsilon =0.25 is special because at this value the speeds of nonlinear slow and intermediate waves are degenerate. The second slow shock leaves epsilon=0.25 unchanged but further reduces the amplitude of the reconnecting magnetic field. Finally, in the core of the exhaust epsilon drops further and the transition is completed by a rotation of the reconnecting field into the out-of-plane direction. The acceleration of the exhaust takes place across the two slow shocks but not during the final rotation. The result is that the outflow speed falls below that expected from the Walen condition based on the asymptotic magnetic field. A simple analytic expression is given for the critical value of epsilon within the exhaust below which SSSs no longer bound the reconnection outflow.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.