Paper detail

The Structure of Radiatively Inefficient Black Hole Accretion Flows

We run three long-timescale general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of radiatively inefficient accretion flows onto non-rotating black holes. Our aim is to achieve steady-state behavior out to large radii and understand the resulting flow structure. A simulation with adiabatic index Gamma = 4/3 and small initial alternating poloidal magnetic field loops is run to a time of 440,000 GM/c^3, reaching inflow equilibrium inside a radius of 370 GM/c^2. Variations with larger alternating field loops and with Gamma = 5/3 are run to 220,000 GM/c^3, attaining equilibrium out to 170 GM/c^2 and 440 GM/c^2. There is no universal self-similar behavior obtained at radii in inflow equilibrium: the Gamma = 5/3 simulation shows a radial density profile with power law index ranging from -1 in the inner regions to -1/2 in the outer regions, while the others have a power-law slope ranging from -1/2 to close to -2. Both simulations with small field loops reach a state with polar inflow of matter, while the more ordered initial field has polar outflows. However, unbound outflows remove only a factor of order unity of the inflowing material over a factor of ~300 in radius. Our results suggest that the dynamics of radiatively inefficient accretion flows are sensitive to how the flow is fed from larger radii, and may differ appreciably in different astrophysical systems. Millimeter images appropriate for Sgr A* are qualitatively (but not quantitatively) similar in all simulations, with a prominent asymmetric image due to Doppler boosting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.