Paper detail

The structure of nearly isothermal, adiabatic shockwaves

An explosively generated shockwave with time-dependent radius $R(t)$ is characterized by a phase in which the shocked gas becomes radiative with an effective adiabatic index $γ\simeq 1$. Using the result that the post-shock gas is compressed into a shell of width $ΔR/R \simeq δ$, where $δ= γ-1$, we show that a choice of self-similar variable that exploits this compressive behavior in the limit that $γ\rightarrow 1$ naturally leads to a series expansion of the post-shock fluid density, pressure, and velocity in the small quantity $δ$. We demonstrate that the leading-order (in $δ$) solutions, which are increasingly accurate as $γ\rightarrow 1$, can be written in simple, closed forms when the fluid is still approximated to be in the energy-conserving regime (i.e., the Sedov-Taylor limit), and that the density declines exponentially rapidly with distance behind the shock. We also analyze the solutions for the bubble surrounding a stellar or galactic wind that interacts with its surroundings, and derive expressions for the location of the contact discontinuity that separates the shocked ambient gas from the shocked wind. We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of the dynamical stability of nearly isothermal shocks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.