Paper detail

The Strip-Decomposition of m-Dyck Paths

The $m$-Tamari lattices $\mathcal{T}_{n}^{(m)}$, introduced by Bergeron and Pr{é}ville-Ratelle, are defined as a poset of $m$-Dyck paths equipped with the generalized rotation order, and constitute a Fuss-Catalan generalization of the classical Tamari lattices $\mathcal{T}_{n}$. While for $\mathcal{T}_{n}$ many combinatorial realizations are known, to present there is no further combinatorial realization of $\mathcal{T}_{n}^{(m)}$. In this article, we introduce a certain decomposition of $m$-Dyck paths into $m$-tuples of Dyck paths, and after a certain modification of these $m$-tuples, we conjecture that the resulting $m$-tuples of Dyck paths realize $\mathcal{T}_{n}^{(m)}$ as an induced subposet of the $m$-fold direct product of $\mathcal{T}_{n}$ with itself. We are able to prove this conjecture for $n\leq 3$, and provide necessary conditions for $m$-tuples of Dyck paths to belong to this realization. However, for $n\geq 5$, no sufficient condition is known.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.