Paper detail

The Stretch Factor of the Delaunay Triangulation Is Less Than 1.998

Let $S$ be a finite set of points in the Euclidean plane. Let $D$ be a Delaunay triangulation of $S$. The {\em stretch factor} (also known as {\em dilation} or {\em spanning ratio}) of $D$ is the maximum ratio, among all points $p$ and $q$ in $S$, of the shortest path distance from $p$ to $q$ in $D$ over the Euclidean distance $||pq||$. Proving a tight bound on the stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation has been a long standing open problem in computational geometry. In this paper we prove that the stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation of a set of points in the plane is less than $ρ= 1.998$, improving the previous best upper bound of 2.42 by Keil and Gutwin (1989). Our bound 1.998 is better than the current upper bound of 2.33 for the special case when the point set is in convex position by Cui, Kanj and Xia (2009). This upper bound breaks the barrier 2, which is significant because previously no family of plane graphs was known to have a stretch factor guaranteed to be less than 2 on any set of points.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.