Paper detail

The stress-pressure relationship in simulations of MRI-induced turbulence

We determine how MRI-turbulent stresses depend on gas pressure via a suite of unstratified shearing box simulations. Earlier numerical work reported only a very weak dependence at best, results that call into question the canonical alpha-disk model and the thermal stability results that follow from it. Our simulations, in contrast, exhibit a stronger relationship, and show that previous work was box-size limited: turbulent `eddies' were artificially restricted by the numerical domain rather than by the scale height. Zero-net-flux runs without physical diffusion coefficients yield a stress proportional to $P^{0.5}$, where P is pressure. The stresses are also proportional to the grid length and hence remain numerically unconverged. The same runs with physical diffusivities, however, give a result closer to an alpha-disk: the stress is proportional to $P^{0.9}$. Net-flux simulations without explicit diffusion exhibit stresses proportional to $P^{0.5}$, but stronger imposed fields weaken this correlation. In summary, compressibility is important for the saturation of the MRI, but the exact stress-pressure relationship is difficult to ascertain in local simulations because of numerical convergence issues and the influence of any imposed flux. As a consequence, the interpretation of thermal stability behaviour in local simulations is a problematic enterprise.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.