Paper detail

The Streaming Instability Cannot Form Planetesimals from mm-size Grains in Pressure Bumps

We present evidence that it is unlikely that the streaming instability (SI) can form planetesimals from mm grains inside axisymmetric pressure bumps. We conducted the largest simulation of the SI so far (7 million CPU hours), consisting of a large slice of the disk with mm grains, a solar-like dust-to-gas ratio ($Z = 0.01$), and the largest pressure bump that does not cause gravitational instability (GI) in the particle layer. We used a high resolution of $1000/H$ to resolve as many SI unstable modes as possible. The simulation produced a long-lived particle over-density far exceeding the SI criteria (i.e., a critical solid abundance to headwind parameter ratio $Z/Π$) where strong clumping would occur if these conditions were present over an extended region of the disk; yet we observed none. The likely reason is that the time it takes particles to cross the high-$Z/Π$ region ($t_{\rm cross}$) is shorter than the growth timescale of the SI ($t_{\rm grow}$). We propose an added criterion for planetesimal formation by the SI -- that $t_{\rm cross} > t_{\rm grow}$. We show that any bump larger than the one in this run would form planetesimals by the GI instead of the SI. Our results significantly restrict the pathways to planet formation: Either protoplanetary disks regularly form grains larger than 1~mm, or planetesimals do not form by the SI in axisymmetric pressure bumps. Since bumps large enough to induce the GI are likely Rossby-wave unstable, we propose that mm grains may only form planetesimals in vortices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.