Paper detail

The Stokes problem with Navier slip boundary condition: Minimal fractional Sobolev regularity of the domain

We prove well-posedness in reflexive Sobolev spaces of weak solutions to the stationary Stokes problem with Navier slip boundary condition over bounded domains $Ω$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ of class $W^{2-1/s}_s$, $s>n$. Since such domains are of class $C^{1,1-n/s}$, our result improves upon the recent one by Amrouche-Seloula, who assume $Ω$ to be of class $C^{1,1}$. We deal with the slip boundary condition directly via a new localization technique, which features domain, space and operator decompositions. To flatten the boundary of $Ω$ locally, we construct a novel $W^2_s$ diffeomorphism for $Ω$ of class $W^{2-1/s}_s$. The fractional regularity gain, from $2-1/s$ to $2$, guarantees that the Piola transform is of class $W^1_s$. This allows us to transform $W^1_r$ vector fields without changing their regularity, provided $r\le s$, and preserve the unit normal which is Hölder. It is in this sense that the boundary regularity $W^{2-1/s}_s$ seems to be minimal.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.