Paper detail

The stellar velocity distribution function in the Milky Way galaxy

The stellar velocity distribution function (DF) in the solar vicinity is re-examined using data from the SDSS APOGEE survey&#39;s DR16 and \emph{Gaia} DR2. By exploiting APOGEE&#39;s ability to chemically discriminate with great reliability the thin disk, thick disk and (accreted) halo populations, we can, for the first time, derive the three-dimensional velocity DFs for these chemically-separated populations. We employ this smaller, but more data-rich APOGEE+{\it Gaia} sample to build a \emph{data-driven model} of the local stellar population velocity DFs, and use these as basis vectors for assessing the relative density proportions of these populations over 5 $<$ $R$ $<$ 12 kpc, and $-1.5$ $<$ $z$ $<$ 2.5 kpc range as derived from the larger, more complete (i.e., all-sky, magnitude-limited) {\it Gaia} database. We find that 81.9 $\pm$ 3.1$\%$ of the objects in the selected \emph{Gaia} data-set are thin-disk stars, 16.6 $\pm$ 3.2$\%$ are thick-disk stars, and 1.5 $\pm$ 0.1$\%$ belong to the Milky Way stellar halo. We also find the local thick-to-thin-disk density normalization to be $ρ_{T}(R_{\odot})$/$ρ_{t}(R_{\odot})$ = 2.1 $\pm$ 0.2$\%$, a result consistent with, but determined in a completely different way than, typical starcount/density analyses. Using the same methodology, the local halo-to-disk density normalization is found to be $ρ_{H}(R_{\odot})$/($ρ_{T}(R_{\odot})$ + $ρ_{t}(R_{\odot})$) = 1.2 $\pm$ 0.6$\%$, a value that may be inflated due to chemical overlap of halo and metal-weak thick disk stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.