Paper detail

The stellar population of the star forming region G61.48+0.09

- Context: We present the results of a near-infrared photometric and spectroscopic study of the star forming region G61.48+0.09. - Aims: The purpose of this study is to characterize the stellar content of the cluster and to determine its distance, extinction, age and mass. - Methods: The stellar population was studied by using color-magnitude diagrams to select twenty promising cluster members, for which follow up spectroscopy was done. The observed spectra allowed a spectral classification of the stars. - Results: Two stars have emission lines, twelve are G-type stars, and six are late-O or early-B stars. - Conclusions: The cluster's extinction varies from A_{K_S} = 0.9 to A_{K_S} = 2.6, (or A_{V}~8 to A_{V}~23). G61.48+0.09 is a star forming region located at 2.5+/-0.4 Kpc. The cluster is younger than 10 Myr and has a minimum stellar mass of 1500+/-500 Solar masses. However, the actual total mass of the cluster remains undetermined, as we cannot see its whole stellar content.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.