Paper detail

The Stellar Population of Metal-Poor Galaxies at z $\approx$ 0.8 and the Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity Relation

We present results from deep Spitzer/Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) observations of 28 metal-poor, strongly star-forming galaxies selected from the DEEP2 Galaxy Survey. By modelling infrared and optical photometry, we derive stellar masses and other stellar properties. We determine that these metal-poor galaxies have low stellar masses, $M_{\star}$ $\approx10^{8.1}$-$10^{9.5}$ $M_{\odot}$. Combined with the Balmer-derived star formation rates (SFRs), these galaxies have average inverse SFR/$M_{\star}$ of $\approx$100 Myr. The evolution of stellar mass-gas metallicity relation to $z\approx0.8$ is measured by combining the modelled masses with previously obtained spectroscopic measurements of metallicity from [O III] $λ$4363 detections. Here, we include measurements for 79 galaxies from the Metal Abundances across Cosmic Time Survey. Our mass-metallicity relation is lower at a given stellar mass than at $z=0.1$ by 0.27 dex. This demonstrates a strong evolution in the mass-metallicity relation, $(1+z)^{-1.45^{+0.61}_{-0.76}}$. We find that the shape of the $z\approx0.8$ mass-metallicity relation, a steep rise in metallicity at low stellar masses, transitioning to a plateau at higher masses, is consistent with $z\sim0.1$ studies. We also compare the evolution in metallicity between $z\approx0.8$ and $z\sim0.1$ against recent strong-line diagnostic studies at intermediate redshifts and find good agreement. Specifically, we find that lower mass galaxies ($4\times10^8$ $M_{\odot}$) built up their metal content 1.6 times more rapidly than higher mass galaxies ($10^{10}$ $M_{\odot}$). Finally, we examine whether the mass-metallicity relation has a secondary dependence on SFR, and statistically concluded that there is no strong secondary dependence for $z\approx0.8$ low-mass galaxies.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.