Paper detail

The stellar metallicity gradients of Local Group dwarf galaxies

Through a homogeneous analysis of spectroscopic literature data of red giant stars, we determine the radial metallicity profiles of 30 dwarf galaxies in the Local Group. We explore correlations between the calculated metallicity gradients and stellar mass, star formation history and environment, delivering the largest compilation to date of this type. The dwarf galaxies in our sample mostly show metallicity profiles decreasing with radius, with some exhibiting rather steep profiles. The derived metallicity gradients as a function of the half-light radius, $\nabla_{\rm [Fe/H]} (R/R_e)$, show no statistical differences when compared with the galaxies' morphological type, nor with their distance from the Milky Way or M31. No correlations are found with either stellar mass or star formation timescales. In particular, we do not find the linear relationship between $\nabla_{\rm [Fe/H]} (R/R_e)$ and the galaxies' median age $t_{50}$, as instead shown in the literature for a set of simulated systems. The presence of high angular momentum in some of our galaxies does not seem to have an impact on the gradient values. The strongest gradients in our sample are observed in systems that are likely to have experienced a past merger event. By excluding them, the analysed dwarf galaxies show mild gradients ($\sim -0.1$ dex $R_e^{-1}$) with little scatter between them, regardless of their stellar mass, dynamical state, and star formation history. These results are in good agreement with different sets of simulations presented in the literature and analysed using the same method as for the observed sample. The interplay between the multitude of factors that could drive the formation of metallicity gradients in dwarf galaxies likely combine in complex ways to produce in general comparable values.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.