Paper detail

The stellar mass versus stellar metallicity relation of star-forming galaxies at $1.6\le z\le3.0$ and implications for the evolution of the $α$-enhancement

We measure the relationship between stellar mass and stellar metallicity, the stellar mass--metallicity relation (MZR), for 1336 star-forming galaxies at $1.6\le z\le3.0$ (<z>=2.2) using rest-frame far-ultraviolet spectra from the zCOSMOS-deep survey. High signal-to-noise composite spectra containing stellar absorption features are fit with population synthesis model spectra of a range of metallicity. We find stellar metallicities, which mostly reflect iron abundances, scaling as $(Z_{Fe,\ast}/Z_{Fe,\odot})=-(0.81\pm0.01)+(0.32+0.03)\log(M_\ast/10^{10}M_\odot)$ across the mass range of $10^9\lesssim M_\ast/M_\odot\lesssim10^{11}$, being $\approx6\times$ lower than seen locally at the same masses. The instantaneous oxygen-to-iron ratio ($α$-enhancement) inferred using the gas-phase oxygen MZRs, is on average found to be [O/Fe]$\approx0.47$, being higher than the local [O/Fe]$\approx0$. The observed changes in [O/Fe] and [Fe/H] are reproduced in simple flow-through gas-regulator models with steady star-formation histories (SFHs) that follow the evolving main sequence. Our models show that the [O/Fe] is determined almost entirely by the instantaneous specific star formation rate alone while being independent of the SFHs, mass, and the gas-regulation characteristics of the systems. We find that the locations of $\sim10^{10}M_\odot$ galaxies at z~2 in the [O/Fe]--metallicity planes are in remarkable agreement with the sequence of low-metallicity thick-disk stars in our Galaxy. This manifests a beautiful concordance between the results of Galactic archaeology and observations of high-redshift Milky Way progenitors. However, there remains a question of how and when the old metal-rich, low-$α$/Fe stars seen in the bulge had formed by z~2 because such a stellar population is not seen in our data and difficult to explain in the context of our models.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.