Paper detail

The Stellar Mass Fundamental Plane: The virial relation and a very thin plane for slow-rotators

Early-type galaxies -- slow and fast rotating ellipticals (E-SRs and E-FRs) and S0s/lenticulars -- define a Fundamental Plane (FP) in the space of half-light radius $R_e$, enclosed surface brightness $I_e$ and velocity dispersion $σ_e$. Since $I_e$ and $σ_e$ are distance-independent measurements, the thickness of the FP is often expressed in terms of the accuracy with which $I_e$ and $σ_e$ can be used to estimate sizes $R_e$. We show that: 1) The thickness of the FP depends strongly on morphology. If the sample only includes E-SRs, then the observed scatter in $R_e$ is $\sim 16\%$, of which only $\sim 9\%$ is intrinsic. Removing galaxies with $M_*<10^{11}M_\odot$ further reduces the observed scatter to $\sim 13\%$ ($\sim 4\%$ intrinsic). The observed scatter increases to the $\sim 25\%$ usually quoted in the literature if E-FRs and S0s are added. If the FP is defined using the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix of the observables, then the E-SRs again define an exceptionally thin FP, with intrinsic scatter of only $5\%$ orthogonal to the plane. 2) The structure within the FP is most easily understood as arising from the fact that $I_e$ and $σ_e$ are nearly independent, whereas the $R_e-I_e$ and $R_e-σ_e$ correlations are nearly equal and opposite. 3) If the coefficients of the FP differ from those associated with the virial theorem the plane is said to be `tilted'. If we multiply $I_e$ by the global stellar mass-to-light ratio $M_*/L$ and we account for non-homology across the population by using Sérsic photometry, then the resulting stellar mass FP is less tilted. Accounting self-consistently for $M_*/L$ gradients will change the tilt. The tilt we currently see suggests that the efficiency of turning baryons into stars increases and/or the dark matter fraction decreases as stellar surface brightness increases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.