Paper detail

The stellar IMF determined in early-type galaxies from a non-degenerate set of optical line indices

We investigate the optical spectral region of spectra of 1000 stars searching for IMF-sensitive features to constrain the low-mass end of the initial mass function (IMF) slope in elliptical galaxies. We use the MILES stellar library in the wavelength range [3500-7500] Å to select indices that are sensitive to cool dwarf stars and that only weakly depend on age and metallicity. In this wavelength range, the response of a change in the effective temperature of the cool red giant population is similar to the response of a change in the number of dwarf stars in the galaxy. We investigate the degeneracy between IMF variation and Teff,RGB and show that it is possible to break it with the new IMF indicators defined here. In particular, we define a CaH1 index around λ6380 Å that arises purely from cool dwarfs, does not strongly depend on age and is anti-correlated with [a/Fe]. This index allows the determination of the the IMF slope when combined with TiO lines and age- and metallicity-dependent features. The use of several indicators is crucial to break degeneracies between IMF, age, abundance pattern and Teff of the RGB population. We measure line-index strengths of the optical IMF indicators in the SSP models and compare these with index strengths of the same features in stacked SSDSS early-type galaxy spectra with varying velocity dispersions. Using 10 different indicators, we find a clear trend of a steepening IMF with increasing velocity dispersion described by the equation x=(2.3+-0.1)*logσ200+(2.13+-0.15), where x is the IMF slope and σ200 is the central stellar velocity dispersion measured in units of 200km/s. We compute the 'IMF mismatch' parameter as the ratio of stellar mass-to-light ratio predicted from the x-σ200 relation to that inferred from SSP models assuming a Salpeter IMF and find good agreement with independent published results.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.