Paper detail

The stellar content of the ROSAT all-sky survey

We present and apply a method to identify the stellar content of the ROSAT all-sky survey (RASS). We performed a crossmatch between the RASS sources and stellar candidates selected from Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) and estimated stellar probabilities for every RASS source from the geometric properties of the match and additional properties, namely the X-ray to G-band flux ratio and the counterpart distances. A comparison with preliminary detections from the first eROSITA all-sky survey (eRASS1) show that the positional offsets of the RASS sources are larger than expected from the uncertainties given in the RASS catalog. From the RASS sources with reliable positional uncertainties, we identify 28630 (24.9 %) sources as stellar; this is the largest sample of stellar X-ray sources to date. Directly from the stellar probabilities, we estimate the completeness and reliability of the sample to be about 93 % and confirm this value by comparing it to the identification of randomly shifted RASS sources, preliminary stellar eRASS1 identifications, and results from a previous identification of RASS sources. Our stellar RASS sources contain sources of all spectral types and luminosity classes. According to their position in the color-magnitude diagram, many stellar RASS sources are young stars with ages of a few $10^7$ yr or binaries. When plotting the X-ray to bolometric flux ratio as a function of the color, the onset of convection and the saturation limit are clearly visible. We note that later-type stars reach continuously higher $F_X/F_{bol}$ values, which is probably due to more frequent flaring. The color distribution of the stellar RASS sources clearly differs from the unrelated background sources. We present the three-dimensional distribution of the stellar RASS sources that shows a clear increase in the source density near known stellar clusters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.