Paper detail

The Stellar Content and Distance of UGC 4483

We present HST/WFPC2 observations of UGC 4483, an irregular galaxy in the M81/NGC 2403 complex. Stellar photometry was carried out with HSTphot, and is complete to V ~ 26.0 and I ~ 24.7. We measure the red giant branch tip at I = 23.56 +/- 0.10 and calculated a distance modulus of (m-M)o = 27.53 +/- 0.12 (corresponding to a distance of 3.2 +/- 0.2 Mpc), placing UGC 4483 within the NGC 2403 subgroup. We were able to measure properties of a previously-known young star cluster in UGC 4483, finding integrated magnitudes of V = 18.66 +/- 0.21 and I = 18.54 +/- 0.10 for the stellar contribution (integrated light minus Halpha and [OIII] contribution), corresponding to an age of ~10-15 Myr and initial mass of ~10^4 Msun. This is consistent with the properties of the cluster's brightest stars, which were resolved in the data for the first time. Finally, a numerical analysis of the galaxy's stellar content yields a roughly constant star formation rate of 1.3x10^-3 Msun/yr and mean metallicity of [Fe/H] = -1.3 dex from 15 Gyr ago to the present.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.