Paper detail

The statistics of BAT-to-XRT flux ratio in GRB: Evidence for a characteristic value and its implications

We present the statistics of the ratio, ${\cal R}$, between the prompt and afterglow "plateau" fluxes of GRB. This we define as the ratio between the mean prompt energy flux in {\em Swift} BAT and the {\em Swift} XRT one, immediately following the steep transition between these two states and the beginning of the afterglow stage referred to as the "plateau". Like the distribution of many other GRB observables, the histogram of ${\cal R}$~ is log-normal with maximum at a value ${\cal R}_m \simeq 2,000$, FWHM of about 2 decades and with the entire distribution spanning about 5 decades in the value of ${\cal R}$. We note that the peak of the distribution is close to the proton-to-electron mass ratio $({\cal R}_m \simeq m_p/m_e = 1836)$, as proposed to be the case in an earlier publication, on the basis of a specific model of the GRB dissipation process. It therefore appears that, in addition to the values of the energy of peak luminosity ${E_{\rm pk}\sim m_{e} c^2}$, GRB present us with one more quantity with an apparent characteristic value. The fact that the values of both these quantities (\Ep~and \R) are consistent with the same specific model invoked to account for the efficient conversion of their relativistic proton energies to electrons, argues favorably for its underlying assumptions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.