Paper detail

The state of globular clusters at birth II: primordial binaries

(abridged) In this paper, we constrain the properties of primordial binary populations in Galactic globular clusters using the MOCCA Monte Carlo code for cluster evolution. Our results are compared to the observations of Milone et al. (2012) using the photometric binary populations as proxies for the true underlying distributions, in order to test the hypothesis that the data are consistent with an universal initial binary fraction near unity and the binary orbital parameter distributions of Kroupa (1995). With the exception of a few possible outliers, we find that the data are to first-order consistent with the universality hypothesis. Specifically, the present-day binary fractions inside the half-mass radius r$_{\rm h}$ can be reproduced assuming either high initial binary fractions near unity with a dominant soft binary component as in the Kroupa distribution combined with high initial densities (10$^4$-10$^6$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-3}$), or low initial binary fractions ($\sim$ 5-10%) with a dominant hard binary component combined with moderate initial densities near their present-day values (10$^2$-10$^3$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-3}$). This apparent degeneracy can be broken using the binary fractions outside r$_{\rm h}$- only high initial binary fractions with a significant soft component combined with high initial densities can contribute to reproducing the observed anti-correlation between the binary fractions outside r$_{\rm h}$ and the total cluster mass. We further illustrate using the simulated present-day binary orbital parameter distributions and the technique introduced in Leigh et al. (2012) that the relative fractions of hard and soft binaries can be used to further constrain the initial cluster density and mass-density relation. Our results favour an initial mass-density relation of the form r$_{\rm h} \propto$ M$_{\rm clus}^α$ with $α<$ 1/3.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.